Articles

Search Articles

Search our total archive of 490 articles

481 to 490 of 490 articles

pages first | < prev | 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Fri, 29th October 1999

Lathom Construction Ltd -v- (1) Brian Cross (2) Anne Cross

The defendants would have had a reasonable prospect of success in contending at any trial that the adjudicator?s decision that the defendants should pay specified sums to the claimant due to it under the compromise agreement was made without jurisdiction

Fri, 6th August 1999

Palmers Limited -v- ABB Power Construction Limited

The sub-sub-sub-contract for the provision of temporary scaffolding around the structural frame forming part of the contract for the assembly and erection of a generator was a ?construction contract? within the meaning of section 104(1) of the Construction Act 1996

Thu, 29th July 1999

John Cothliff Limited -v- Allen Build (North West) Limited

The adjudicator's award of costs in his decision under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 should be enforced by way of summary judgement

Fri, 16th July 1999

The Project Consultancy Group -v- The Trustees of The Gray Trust

An adjudicator?s decision could be challenged on the ground that the adjudicator was not empowered to make the decision by reason of the contract not being a ?construction contract? or of the contract not being subject to the Construction Act 1996

Mon, 12th July 1999

Allied London & Scottish Properties Plc -v- Riverbrae Construction Limited

The employer?s application for judicial review of the adjudicator?s decision payments should be made ?peremptorily? on the ground that the adjudicator failed to implement paragraph 23(1) of the Scheme for Construction Contracts failed

Wed, 23rd June 1999

A & D Maintenance and Construction Limited -v- Pagehurst Construction Services Limited

Neither the sub-contract?s termination nor the contractor?s complaints about the work affected the enforceability of the decision

Fri, 16th April 1999

A. Straume (UK) Limited -v- Bradlor Developments Limited

Adjudication constituted quasi legal proceedings within the meaning of section 11(3)(d) of the Insolvency Act 1986 and the employer should not have leave under section 11(3)(d) to start an adjudication against the contractor against which an administration order had been made where the contractor had already started an adjudication against it

Mon, 15th March 1999

Outwing Construction Ltd -v- H. Randell & Son Ltd

It was proper and prudent for the sub-contractor to have commenced court proceedings by issuing a writ as its chosen method of enforcing the adjudicator?s decision for the contractor to pay monies to it in circumstances where the Scheme for Construction Contracts applied

Fri, 12th March 1999

Rentokil Ailsa Environmental Limited -v- Eastend Civil Engineering Limited

The arrestments by the employer of the sums awarded by the adjudicator were vexatious and oppressive (and should be recalled) on the basis that they were mainly used to embarrass the contractor, to defeat the awards and to strain the contractor?s financial credit

Fri, 12th February 1999

Macob Civil Engineering Ltd -v- Morrison Construction Ltd

The adjudicator?s decision in the sub-contractor?s favour should be enforced by way of summary judgement

pages first | < prev | 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Other News Articles

Archived News

Regulated by RICS - Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors

For immediate assistance with all construction related matters, call The Vinden Partnership now on 0845 504 9733.