<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Articles</title>
<description>Articles from The Vinden Partnership</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles</link>
<item>
<title>Sg South Ltd V Swan Yard (Cirencester) Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The adjudicator had jurisdiction to make his decision despite there having been no written contract by reason of the parties’ exchanges in the adjudication and/or the court proceedings amounting to an exchange of written submissions under section 107(5) of the Construction Act</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/sg%20south%20ltd%20v%20swan%20yard%20%28cirencester%29%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Speymill Contracts Ltd V Baskind | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>It was not the case that the adjudicator in coming to his decision disregarded a material consideration, namely the allegation of theft by the contractor, or failed properly to address that issue</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/speymill%20contracts%20ltd%20v%20baskind.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Amec Group Ltd V Thames Water Utilities Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Principles relevant to the interplay between adjudication and the rules of natural justice set out by Coulson J</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/amec%20group%20ltd%20v%20thames%20water%20utilities%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Forest Heath District Council V Isg Jackson Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The circumstances in which it might be appropriate for the court to make a declaration under the Part 8 procedure with particular reference to a declaration in relation to adjudication</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/forest%20heath%20district%20council%20v%20isg%20jackson%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New TVP Brochures Now Available | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>In addition to our new website, we have completely redesigned our corporate brochures to provide a more user-friendly summary of the services we can provide.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/latest%20news/new%20tvp%20brochures%20now%20available.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>GPS Marine Contractors Ltd V Ringway Infrastructure Services Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Comments as to the circumstances in which a responding party’s general reservation as to an adjudicator’s jurisdiction will be effective</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/gps%20marine%20contractors%20ltd%20v%20ringway%20infrastructure%20services%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A &#163; 24 Billion Pound Secret | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Not many people are aware of a quite frightening business secret.  Believe it or not - the estimated annual cost of conflict in the workplace to the UK economy is a staggering &#163; 24 billion pounds!!</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/press/a%20%A324%20billion%20pound%20secret.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A &#163; 24 Billion Pound Secret | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Not many people are aware of a quite frightening business secret.  Believe it or not - the estimated annual cost of conflict in the workplace to the UK economy is a staggering &#163; 24 billion pounds!!</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/latest%20news/a%20%A324%20billion%20pound%20secret.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Banner Holdings Ltd V Colchester Borough Council | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The approach to be adopted if a term of a construction contract does not comply with the adjudication or payment provisions required by the Construction Act</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/banner%20holdings%20ltd%20v%20colchester%20borough%20council.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rok Building Ltd V Celtic Composting Systems Ltd (Part II) | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The contractor’s contention that the adjudicator acted in breach of the rules of natural justice by reaching a decision contrary to the overwhelming weight of evidence and by wrongly failing to apply the “slip” rule to correct the errors in his decision pointed out by it should be rejected</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/rok%20building%20ltd%20v%20celtic%20composting%20systems%20ltd%20%28part%20ii%29.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Supablast (Nationwide) Ltd V Story Rail Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The contractor’s contention that there were two sub-contracts should be rejected with the result that the adjudicator’s decision awarding the sub-contractor a specified sum should be enforced by summary judgment</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/supablast%20%28nationwide%29%20ltd%20v%20story%20rail%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>TVP Launches Vindemnity insurance product | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The Vinden Partnership (TVP), a leading North West property consultancy, has launched Vindemnity a unique insurance product for the construction industry following the appointment of Steve Padley.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/press/tvp%20launches%20vindemnity%20insurance%20product.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vindemnity | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The Vinden Partnership (TVP), a leading North West property consultancy, has launched Vindemnity a unique insurance product for the construction industry following the appointment of Steve Padley.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/latest%20news/vindemnity.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shaw V MFP Foundations &amp; Piling Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The statutory demands made by the contractor against the homeowners in respect of the sum which the adjudicator directed the homeowners to pay the contractor should be set aside</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/shaw%20v%20mfp%20foundations%20%26%20piling%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Property predictions for 2010 | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Peter Vinden, Managing Director of construction project management company, The Vinden Partnership, said...</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/latest%20news/property%20predictions%20for%202010.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>RWE Npower Plc V Alstom Power Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The contract precluded a set off from being raised against the sum awarded to the contractor by the adjudicator so that the employer was not entitled to set off its claim for liquidated damages where that claim was assumed to be bona fide, arguable and capable of operating as a set off</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/rwe%20npower%20plc%20v%20alstom%20power%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jacques V Ensign Contractors Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>An adjudicator was not in breach of the rules of natural justice if the decision did not address each and every aspect of the evidence adduced by the parties</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/jacques%20v%20ensign%20contractors%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ODonnell Developments Ltd V Buildability Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The adjudicators application of the slip rule to correct the accidental error in his decision was made within his jurisdiction and the court could not and should interfere with it and even if the court could interfere, the error was an inadvertent slip and should not be interfered with</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/o%27donnell%20developments%20ltd%20v%20buildability%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anglo Swiss Holdings Ltd v Packman Lucas Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The proceedings brought by the clients against the consultant in which they claimed the sums directed by the adjudicator to be paid by them to the consultant should be stayed until the clients paid those sums</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/anglo%20swiss%20holdings%20ltd%20v%20packman%20lucas%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fenice Investments Inc V Jerram Falkus Construction Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The employer should pay the costs of the Part 8 proceedings brought by it for declarations as to the true construction of the contract’s payment mechanisms on the standard basis and the costs of the contractor’s Part 7 proceedings to enforce the adjudicator’s on an indemnity basis</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/fenice%20investments%20inc%20v%20jerram%20falkus%20construction%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
