<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Articles</title>
<description>Articles from The Vinden Partnership</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles</link>
<item>
<title>Medical Practice &amp; Pharmacy - Altrincham | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Creation of Doctors Surgery and Pharmacy.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/case%20studies/medical%20practice%20%26%20pharmacy%20-%20altrincham.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hampton by Hilton, Birmingham City North | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Redevelopment of existing building to create Hampton by Hilton branded hotel.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/case%20studies/hampton%20by%20hilton%2C%20birmingham%20city%20north.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Square, Didsbury | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Design and construction of high specification dwellings.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/case%20studies/the%20square%2C%20didsbury.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Starbucks and KFC Drive Thru, Heathrow | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Design and construction of new build Starbucks and KFC</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/case%20studies/starbucks%20and%20kfc%20drive%20thru%2C%20heathrow.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sandalwood Farm, Macclesfield | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Design and construction of a high specification single residential development.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/case%20studies/sandalwood%20farm%2C%20macclesfield.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Accor Adagio Aparthotel, Liverpool | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Construction of aparthotel within a Grade II listed building.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/case%20studies/accor%20adagio%20aparthotel%2C%20liverpool.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>VIP Computers, Warrington | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Warehouse extension to existing storage facility.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/case%20studies/vip%20computers%2C%20warrington.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sleepy Hollow, Prestbury | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Design and construction of a high specification residential development.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/case%20studies/sleepy%20hollow%2C%20prestbury.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Westfields Construction Ltd V Lewis | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The home owner could not be regarded as a residential occupier for the purposes of section 106 of the Contruction Act</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/westfields%20construction%20ltd%20v%20lewis.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arcadis Uk Ltd V May And Baker Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The adjudicator did not go off on a frolic of his own and was therefore not in breach of the rules of natural justice by splitting the difference between the adjusted forecast figures of the contractor and the project manager</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/arcadis%20uk%20ltd%20v%20may%20and%20baker%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sw Global Resourcing Ltd V Morris &amp; Spottiswood Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The alleged logical inconsistences and demonstrable irrationality in the adjudicators decision did not mean that it was open to judicial review in Scotland on Wednesbury grounds</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/sw%20global%20resourcing%20ltd%20v%20morris%20%26%20spottiswood%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rodgers Contracts (Ballynahinch) Ltd V Merex Construction Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The summary judgement enforcing the adjudicators award was stayed on condition that the sum awarded was paid into court</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/rodgers%20contracts%20%28ballynahinch%29%20ltd%20v%20merex%20construction%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vertase Fli Ltd V Squibb Group Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The decision in the second adjudication by which the adjudicator awarded the contractor a specified sum in respect of liquidated damages should not be enforced by way of summary judgment</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/vertase%20fli%20ltd%20v%20squibb%20group%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lidl UK GMBH V RG Carter Colchester Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The adjudicators award of liquidated damages for a particular period at the full contractural rate which he had no jursidcation to make shopuld be severed from his award of such damages at a reduced rate for a different period which he did not have jurisdication to make</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/lidl%20uk%20gmbh%20v%20rg%20carter%20colchester%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Towsey V Highgrove Homes Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>It would not be just and equitable to make a winding up order against the developer company with the result that the winding up petition brought by the builders against it should be dismissed</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/towsey%20v%20highgrove%20homes%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Systech International Ltd V PC Harrington Contractors Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The adjudicator was not entitled to payment from the contractor for the work he carried out in reaching his decision which turned out not to be enforceable due to his breaches of the rules of natural justice</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/systech%20international%20ltd%20v%20pc%20harrington%20contractors%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Clark Electrical Ltd V JMD Developments (UK) Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The adjudicator had been wrong to rule that he had jurisdiction based on an ad hoc agreement of the parties conferring jurisdiction</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/clark%20electrical%20ltd%20v%20jmd%20developments%20%28uk%29%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>LIPB Distribution Facility | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Construction of 500,000 sq ft distribution facility in Liverpool.  Provision of Employers Agent, Quantity Surveying and CDM Coordination Services.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/case%20studies/lipb%20distribution%20facility.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wsp Cel Ltd V Dalkia Utilities Services Plc | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The consultant could only have sought the adjudication of the disputed claims in its final account properly falling within grounds 1 and 2 of the Adjudication Table in teh NEC 3 Professional Services Contract</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/wsp%20cel%20ltd%20v%20dalkia%20utilities%20services%20plc.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beck Interiors Ltd V Classic Decorative Finishing Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>It was no defense to the contractors claim to enforce the adjudicators award of a specified sum to it that a sum was due to the sub-contractor under the final account for its works on a separate contract</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/beck%20interiors%20ltd%20v%20classic%20decorative%20finishing%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
