<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Articles</title>
<description>Articles from The Vinden Partnership</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles</link>
<item>
<title>New TVP Brochures Now Available | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>In addition to our new website, we have completely redesigned our corporate brochures to provide a more user-friendly summary of the services we can provide.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/latest%20news/new%20tvp%20brochures%20now%20available.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A &#163; 24 Billion Pound Secret | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Not many people are aware of a quite frightening business secret.  Believe it or not - the estimated annual cost of conflict in the workplace to the UK economy is a staggering &#163; 24 billion pounds!!</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/press/a%20%A324%20billion%20pound%20secret.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A &#163; 24 Billion Pound Secret | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Not many people are aware of a quite frightening business secret.  Believe it or not - the estimated annual cost of conflict in the workplace to the UK economy is a staggering &#163; 24 billion pounds!!</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/latest%20news/a%20%A324%20billion%20pound%20secret.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rok Building Ltd V Celtic Composting Systems Ltd (Part II) | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The contractor’s contention that the adjudicator acted in breach of the rules of natural justice by reaching a decision contrary to the overwhelming weight of evidence and by wrongly failing to apply the “slip” rule to correct the errors in his decision pointed out by it should be rejected</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/rok%20building%20ltd%20v%20celtic%20composting%20systems%20ltd%20%28part%20ii%29.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Supablast (Nationwide) Ltd V Story Rail Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The contractor’s contention that there were two sub-contracts should be rejected with the result that the adjudicator’s decision awarding the sub-contractor a specified sum should be enforced by summary judgment</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/supablast%20%28nationwide%29%20ltd%20v%20story%20rail%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>TVP Launches Vindemnity insurance product | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The Vinden Partnership (TVP), a leading North West property consultancy, has launched Vindemnity a unique insurance product for the construction industry following the appointment of Steve Padley.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/press/tvp%20launches%20vindemnity%20insurance%20product.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vindemnity | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The Vinden Partnership (TVP), a leading North West property consultancy, has launched Vindemnity a unique insurance product for the construction industry following the appointment of Steve Padley.</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/latest%20news/vindemnity.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shaw V MFP Foundations &amp; Piling Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The statutory demands made by the contractor against the homeowners in respect of the sum which the adjudicator directed the homeowners to pay the contractor should be set aside</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/shaw%20v%20mfp%20foundations%20%26%20piling%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Property predictions for 2010 | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Peter Vinden, Managing Director of construction project management company, The Vinden Partnership, said...</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/latest%20news/property%20predictions%20for%202010.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>RWE Npower Plc V Alstom Power Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The contract precluded a set off from being raised against the sum awarded to the contractor by the adjudicator so that the employer was not entitled to set off its claim for liquidated damages where that claim was assumed to be bona fide, arguable and capable of operating as a set off</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/rwe%20npower%20plc%20v%20alstom%20power%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jacques V Ensign Contractors Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>An adjudicator was not in breach of the rules of natural justice if the decision did not address each and every aspect of the evidence adduced by the parties</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/jacques%20v%20ensign%20contractors%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ODonnell Developments Ltd V Buildability Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The adjudicators application of the slip rule to correct the accidental error in his decision was made within his jurisdiction and the court could not and should interfere with it and even if the court could interfere, the error was an inadvertent slip and should not be interfered with</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/o%27donnell%20developments%20ltd%20v%20buildability%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anglo Swiss Holdings Ltd v Packman Lucas Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The proceedings brought by the clients against the consultant in which they claimed the sums directed by the adjudicator to be paid by them to the consultant should be stayed until the clients paid those sums</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/anglo%20swiss%20holdings%20ltd%20v%20packman%20lucas%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fenice Investments Inc V Jerram Falkus Construction Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The employer should pay the costs of the Part 8 proceedings brought by it for declarations as to the true construction of the contract’s payment mechanisms on the standard basis and the costs of the contractor’s Part 7 proceedings to enforce the adjudicator’s on an indemnity basis</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/fenice%20investments%20inc%20v%20jerram%20falkus%20construction%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Enterprise Managed Services Ltd V Tony Mcfadden Utilities Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>If the adjudicator had taken more of a grip on the adjudication process (as he should have done), it was likely that he would have concluded that the adjudication could not be properly or fairly progressed and that the right course of action was for him to resign</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/enterprise%20managed%20services%20ltd%20v%20tony%20mcfadden%20utilities%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jim Ennis Construction Ltd V Combined Stabilisation Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The sub-sub-contractor remained bound by the final account agreement despite the sub-contractor having wrongly withheld the sum of the sum of &#163; 7,362 from the payment of &#163; 142,901 towards the agreed final account sum of &#163; 707,500 in breach of that agreement</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/jim%20ennis%20construction%20ltd%20v%20combined%20stabilisation%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Allied P &amp; L Ltd v Paradigm Housing Group Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Statements of principle by Akenhead as to whether a dispute or difference capable of being referred to adjudication had arisen and as to a responding party challenging the adjudicators jurisdiction in court enforcement proceedings by reserving its position in the adjudication</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/allied%20p%20%26%20l%20ltd%20v%20paradigm%20housing%20group%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Coventry Scaffolding Company (London) Ltd V Lancsville Construction Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>Akenhead Js guidance to practitioners seeking to enforce adjudicators decisions where the defendant did not participate in court enforcement proceedings actively or at all</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/coventry%20scaffolding%20company%20%28london%29%20ltd%20v%20lancsville%20construction%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Southern Electric Contracting Ltd V Mead Realisations Ltd | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The defendant should pay the claimants legal costs of the court enforcement proceedings to enforce the adjudicators decision, which costs should not be confined to the (&#163; 100) fixed costs for such proceedings and instead should be assessed summarily</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/southern%20electric%20contracting%20ltd%20v%20mead%20realisations%20ltd.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rok Building Ltd V Celtic Composting Systems Ltd (Part I) | The Vinden Partnership</title> 
<description>The sum allowed by adjudicators decision should be enforced by its payment by the contractor without any set off within 14 days of the date of the court hearing</description>
<link>http://www.vinden.co.uk/articles/adjudication/rok%20building%20ltd%20v%20celtic%20composting%20systems%20ltd%20%28part%20i%29.htm</link> 
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
