The item you're looking might have been renamed, removed or relocated.
These are page(s) found with similar content.
- Dispute ManagementFor immediate professional construction dispute assistance call 0845 504 9733 for an objective case appraisal. Construction Dispute Management Bolton, Nottingham, London, Manchester
- Bovis Lend Lease Limited V Triangle Development LimitedThe decision should not be enforced where the contract provided that in the event of the contract's determination, the contractual provisions requiring further payment were not to apply
- Ballast plc V The Burrell Company (Construction Management) Limited - Part IAdjudicator guilty of an error of law by having refused to decide the dispute referred to him on the grounds of the contract's lack of clarity and of the parties' failure to follow what the adjudicator termed "the strict contractual code"
- Ballast plc V The Burrell Company (Construction Management) Limited - Part IIAdjudicator guilty of an error of law by having refused to decide the dispute referred to him on the grounds of the contract's lack of clarity and of the parties' failure to follow what the adjudicator termed 2the strict contractual code"
- Mediation Servicesour mediation services help you achieve settlement of your dispute without invoking formal legal proceedings. Find out how - call 0845 504 9733. The Vinden Partnership.
- Case Presentation and Dispute SettlementProfessional case presentation in dispute settlement negotiations can avoid legal proceedings. Find out how - call us on 0845 504 9733.
- Total M&E Services Ltd V ABB Technologies LtdThe management contractor's application for execution to be stayed on the summary judgment awarded in the trade contractor's favour to enforce the adjudicator's decision on the ground of the trade contractor's financial position should be rejected
- Litigation SupportNegotiations failed? Call 0845 504 9733 now for construction dispute litigation support advice.
- Dispute Management FAQ's
- ArbitrationCall 0845 504 9733 for immediate assistance and advice with resolving your construction dispute by arbitration.
- Comsite Projects Limited V Andritz AGThe work under the building services sub-contract for the dryer building which formed part of the project of the construction of a new waste water treatment works and sewage sludge recycling centre was a "construction operation"
- South West Contractors Ltd v Birakos Enterprises LtdThe adjudicator was not in breach of the rules of natural justice by allegedly having failed to consider its case that the project manager's loss should have been mitigated on the basis that the court should not minutely examine an award to he had made such a mistake
- Statutory AdjudicationStatutory adjudication for construction dispute resolution. Call 0845 504 9733 for immediate assistance and advice with resolving your construction dispute. The Vinden Partnership Manchester Bolton Nottingham London.
- Earls Terrace Properties Ltd v Waterloo Investments LtdThe effect of the deed of variation between the developer and the employer entered into after the Construction Act 1996 came into force, which varied the fee related provisions of the services agreement entered into before that date, was not that the Act applied to the services agreement
- Collins (Contractors) Ltd v Baltic Quay Management (1994) LtdThe propositions advanced by Jackson J in Amec Civil Engineering v The Secretary of State for the Environment (2004) should be accepted and, in particular, the proposition that whilst the mere making of a claim did not amount to a dispute, a dispute would be held to exist once it could reasonably be inferred that a claim was not admitted
- Management Solutions & Professional Consultants Ltd V Bennett (Electrical) Services LtdThe effect of the oral instructions which varied or increased the scope of the sub-sub-contract works was not to remove the sub-sub-contract from the scope of section 107 of the Construction Act
- Primus Build Limited v Pompey Centre LimitedThe adjudicator’s decision should not be enforced on the grounds that the adjudicator acted without jurisdiction and in breach of the rules of natural justice by calculating the construction manager’s loss of profits based on an approach which neither party had raised before him
- New TVP Brochures Now AvailableIn addition to our new website, we have completely redesigned our corporate brochures to provide a more user-friendly summary of the services we can provide.
- BrochuresCompany brochures
- ServicesThe Vinden Partnership (TVP) specialises in dispute management, financial services, construction project management and quantity surveying.
- Sharing Pain and Gain – No Win No Fee Adjudication ServicesGiven the current economic circumstances it is hardly surprising that Vinden’s Dispute and Corporate Recovery teams are expanding rapidly. Peter Vinden, Vinden’s Managing Director, says this is down to a number of factors.
- Insolvency - A Growth IndustryAs the subprime crisis in America sweeps across the Atlantic causing a significant credit squeeze in the UK, one of the first sectors in the firing line is construction. Construction across the UK appears to have fallen victim to the economic uncertainty that exists and latest figures show the sector shrinking for the first time in more than six years.
- Camillin Denny Architects Ltd V Adelaide Jones & Company LtdThe architect should have summary judgment to enforce the adjudicator’s decision for the payment to it of outstanding fees by the client in the sum specified by the adjudicator
- VindemnityThe Vinden Partnership (TVP), a leading North West property consultancy, has launched Vindemnity a unique insurance product for the construction industry following the appointment of Steve Padley.
- Universal Music Operations Limited -v- Flairnote Limited & OthersThe building contract was entered into between the employer and the contractor, and not between the project manager and the contractor
- TVP Launches Vindemnity insurance productThe Vinden Partnership (TVP), a leading North West property consultancy, has launched Vindemnity a unique insurance product for the construction industry following the appointment of Steve Padley.
- Multitasking key to beating recessionQuantity surveyors (QS) are facing an increasing need to multitask to beat the recession and keep building their business, according to experts at the Vinden Partnership.
- LPL Electrical Services Ltd -v- Kershaw Mechanical ServicesThe sub-contractor?s jurisdictional challenge to the adjudicator's decision ordering payment in respect of two applications that the notice of referral only stated that the sub-contractor had not paid on the second of the two applications should not succeed
- Multiplex Constructions UK Ltd v Mott MacDonald LtdThe contractor was entitled to a declaration that the adjudicator's decision as to the true interpretation of the contractual requirement for the structural engineer to give access to all its "pertinent records relating to the services" was binding and that the structural engineer was to comply with that decision

For immediate assistance with all construction related matters, call The Vinden Partnership now on 0845 504 9733.
