The item you're looking might have been renamed, removed or relocated.

These are page(s) found with similar content.

TVP Launches Vindemnity insurance product
The Vinden Partnership (TVP), a leading North West property consultancy, has launched Vindemnity a unique insurance product for the construction industry following the appointment of Steve Padley.
Vindemnity
The Vinden Partnership (TVP), a leading North West property consultancy, has launched Vindemnity a unique insurance product for the construction industry following the appointment of Steve Padley.
Sharing Pain and Gain – No Win No Fee Adjudication Services
Given the current economic circumstances it is hardly surprising that Vinden’s Dispute and Corporate Recovery teams are expanding rapidly. Peter Vinden, Vinden’s Managing Director, says this is down to a number of factors.
Bennett (Electrical) Services Ltd v Inviron Ltd
The sub-sub-contractor's acceptance of the sub-contractor's letter of intent did not bring into existence a contract on the basis that the true construction of the letter was that the parties had agreed a request and restitutionary basis of remuneration
Comsite Projects Limited V Andritz AG
The work under the building services sub-contract for the dryer building which formed part of the project of the construction of a new waste water treatment works and sewage sludge recycling centre was a "construction operation"
Core Covers
We concentrate exclusively in the construction arena in order to maintain a tightly focused, proactive service with a state-of-the-art pool of expertise. As a result, you can rely on our dynamic team of consultants to deliver advice and support based on the very latest industry developments.
Insurance cover and claims
We can inspect and measure premises, preparing cost estimates to cover the demolition and re-building of the premises to determine the appropriate level of insurance cover required.
Earls Terrace Properties Ltd v Waterloo Investments Ltd
The effect of the deed of variation between the developer and the employer entered into after the Construction Act 1996 came into force, which varied the fee related provisions of the services agreement entered into before that date, was not that the Act applied to the services agreement
Insurance Services
Tel: 01204 362888 for advice and assistance in obtaining all construction insurances and commercial and residential building warranties.
Happy Birthday to The Party Wall etc Act 1996
The Party Wall etc Act 1996, which was introduced throughout England and Wales in July 1997, has recently turned 10 years old. Yet, there are many, including professional property developers, that know very little about the Act.
Bonds, Warranties, Insurance and Capital Allowances
We can advise you on the particular terms of any warranty, bond or insurance requirement, negotiate upon their terms and agree the final version of these documents on your behalf.
New TVP Brochures Now Available
In addition to our new website, we have completely redesigned our corporate brochures to provide a more user-friendly summary of the services we can provide.
Specialist Covers
In today’s world, it’s essential to provide your potential customer or tenant with confidence. In recent years there has been a significant increase tenants wanting to see evidence of a Structural Warranty or Latent Defects policy before purchase or entering into an agreement.
Camillin Denny Architects Ltd V Adelaide Jones & Company Ltd
The architect should have summary judgment to enforce the adjudicator’s decision for the payment to it of outstanding fees by the client in the sum specified by the adjudicator
LPL Electrical Services Ltd -v- Kershaw Mechanical Services
The sub-contractor?s jurisdictional challenge to the adjudicator's decision ordering payment in respect of two applications that the notice of referral only stated that the sub-contractor had not paid on the second of the two applications should not succeed
Multiplex Constructions UK Ltd v Mott MacDonald Ltd
The contractor was entitled to a declaration that the adjudicator's decision as to the true interpretation of the contractual requirement for the structural engineer to give access to all its "pertinent records relating to the services" was binding and that the structural engineer was to comply with that decision
Maymac Environmental Services Ltd -v- Faraday Building Services Ltd
Even if the finding that the contractor?s contention that there was no concluded sub-contract should be rejected was wrong, the sub-contractor was still entitled to summary judgment to enforce the adjudicator?s decision in its favour
Cowgill Holloway advises on TVP merger
Cowgill Holloway’s corporate finance department has advised on the merger of The Vinden Partnership Ltd and Watson Laurie Group, a group of companies controlled by Andrew Crompton.
Farebrother Building Services Ltd -v- Frogmore Investments Ltd
The court should enforce the adjudicator's decision made under the TeCSA adjudication rules by way of summary judgment and should not deduct from the sum awarded by the adjudicator the amount of the defendant?s counterclaim by way of set-off
Quantity Surveying - Case Study 18
Retail - Aldi Stores Ltd
Fence Gate Ltd -v- James R Knowles Ltd
The adjudicator did not have jurisdiction under section 104(2) of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 to decide the validity of the consultant?s invoices for work to do with the client's arbitration proceedings against the contractor
Enterprise Managed Services Ltd V Tony Mcfadden Utilities Ltd
If the adjudicator had taken more of a grip on the adjudication process (as he should have done), it was likely that he would have concluded that the adjudication could not be properly or fairly progressed and that the right course of action was for him to resign
Discain Project Services Ltd V Opecprime Developments Ltd (Part I)
The adjudicator was in breach of the rules of natural justice by reason of having had undisclosed communications with a representative of the contractor
Balfour Beatty Engineering Services (HY) Ltd v Shepherd Construction
Propositions derived from caselaw as to what an adjudicator was required to give in terms of reasons if he was obliged to give a reasoned decision and the consequences of his failing to do so
HS Works Ltd V Enterprise Managed Services Ltd
The decisions of the adjudicators in the two adjudications should both be enforced
Interserve Industrial Services Ltd v Cleveland Bridge UK Ltd
The award of a specified sum to the sub-sub-contractor by the adjudicator in the second adjudication should be enforced notwithstanding that the adjudicator in the third adjudication awarded to the sub-contractor a greater sum to be paid by the sub-sub-contractor
Anglian Water Services v Laing O'rourke Utilities Ltd
Clause 93.1 of the core clauses of the second edition of the NEC form of engineering contract was not incompatible with the Scheme for Construction Contracts, did not constitute one of the contractual adjudication provisions and should not be replaced by the adjudication provisions of the Scheme in consequence of the contractual adjudication provisions not complying with the requirements of the Construction Act
Specialist Ceiling Services Northern Ltd v ZVI Construction (UK) Ltd
The adjudication was not unfair by reason of the adjudicator having refused to withdraw after having been informed in the notice of referral of a without prejudice offer and having been sent a copy of the contractor's solicitors' letter enclosing that offer
GPS Marine Contractors Ltd V Ringway Infrastructure Services Ltd
Comments as to the circumstances in which a responding party’s general reservation as to an adjudicator’s jurisdiction will be effective
PT Building Services Ltd V Rok Build Ltd
The contractor's statements to the adjudicator in the second adjudication that the decision in the first adjudication was valid and precluded him from proceeding meant that it could not seek to challenge the validity of the decision

Site Map